Click Title Below To Be Redirected To Each Segment
(They're In Order, The Events Leading Up To And After The 9/11 Attacks
Attacks Happened After 4.)
'2000'
2. The E-Team
'2000'
'2001'
'2001-2008'
5. The Dancing Israelis / Urban Moving / 100s Of Israelis Detained In Connection With The Israeli Art Student Spy Ring
'2001'
'2001'
'2001'
'2001'
'2001'
'2001'
'2001'
Extension Click Below
Note: The New York Times And Washington Post Are Subscription Based, But Most Their Links Have Free Article Abstracts For Viewing... Trove Is All Free :)
Gelitin The B-Thing
In March, 2000, the 'Austrian' art collective Gelitin consisting of Ali Janka, Florian Reither, Tobias Urban, and Wolfgang Gantner, and friends embarked on a new project, which involved (In their words) a "surgical intervention into the World Trade Center in New York City, everything top secret and illegal of course."
Titled The B-Thing.
This provocative endeavor involved a daring and unauthorized infiltration of the 91st floor of the North Tower. There, the group secretly cut out a section of the glass and (In their words) they then "constructed a functioning load-bearing balcony. In a long complicated process they scratched putty from the tall heavy window, which couldn't be opened.
Then they extracted it using suction pads, shunted the balcony out, posed on it at 6am, and had themselves photographed there from a helicopter for their nearest and dearest back home.
They kept very quite about it all, because if word had crept out about their coup, they could have been fined very heavily for sabotaging a national treasure. Even if it was built by the Japanese.
Incidentally, as proof that they were there, there is now a piece of old chewing gum stuck to the outside of the building at a dizzy height."
(Tex Rubinowitz) - Author of Gelitin The B-Thing
Some believe Gelitin's stunt was more than just an art project - it was a reconnaissance mission, gathering intel for a future attack?
Or even worse, planting thermite charges as throughout the booklet all of the art students are only pictured facing away from the camera, although not exactly concealing their identities very well, because one of them has been identified as Hanan Serfaty, an Israeli military intelligence officer and bomb expert.
It was Serfaty who rented two Hollywood apartments close to Mohammad Atta and four of the other named suspects.
-Newspaper Article-
Image 1 - Balcony Scene (Or Unseen) Atop The World (Link Below)
Image 2 - New York Times Article Important Image (Link Below)
Full New York Times Article (Cropped Together)
-Photographs Gelitin Took Inside WTC-
Image 1 - Photos Inside WTC
Image 2 - Photos Inside WTC/On Balcony
Image 3 - Photos Inside WTC/On Balcony
Image 4 - Photo On Balcony Shot From Helicopter
Image 5 - WTC Temporary Construction ID
Image 6 - Gelitin's Photo Wall
Video 1 - Gelitin's B-Thing Lecture (Link Below)
-Unusual Use of BB-18 Fuse Boxes By Gelitin Group-
Concerns have been raised about the unconventional use of BB-18 fuse holders by the artistic group Gelitin.
The BB-18, was used as part of a construction project by the group, which involved building a large structure or "clubhouse," as an extension to their "B-Thing" project.
Interestingly, BB-18 holders are typically used as busbars.
(This is where it gets sticky)
A busbar is a metallic strip or bar that is used for power distribution in low and high voltage applications.
A possible explanation for the collapse of the towers involves placing a thermite charge on a busbar, then overloading the busbar to create an intense localized heat source, triggering more thermite which would have been placed along steel beams and busbars, causing a cascading structural failure.
This method would leave no clear evidence of a conventional controlled demolition, as busbars are standard in high-rise buildings.
Notably, this aligns with reports from firefighters who described molten metal, thermite residue, and steel beams cut at precise angles.
-Extra-
Those BB 18 fuse holders are supplied by the Littel Fuse Company in Chicago, a subsidiary of Tracor Company, a Government contractor based in Austin Texas. Tracor also owned a company called Vitro, formerly known as the Kellex Corporation and now known as Halliburton.
The company of the former Vice President of the United States, Dick Cheney, and the company who made and $40 Billion profit on the Iraq War alone.
Image 1 - BB-18 Fuse Websites
Image 2 - Gelitin's Use Of BB-18
Image 3 - Gelitin's Use Of BB-18
-Gelitin B-Thing Sketches-
Sketch 1 - "Most Popular Suicide Height"/"Deepest Thought Dr. Freud Ever Had" ? (Video Under Sketch Must Watch)
Sketch 2 - "Depression Inside, Amazement Outside" ?
Sketch 3 - "300 Meters Of Pure Pleasure" (Resembles The Falling Man)
Sketch 4 - "It Could Have Been More Intimate"
Sketch 5 - Helicopter Photo And Entry/Exit Plan
Sketch 6 - The Balcony
Video 1 - Gelitin's $3000 B-Thing Book - (https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/284562018579) (Link Below)
Image 1 - The Artist Residency Program In The Twin Towers (Gelitin LMCC Approval)
The E-Team
On March 31st, 2001, The E-Team, a performance art group consisting of Hajoe Moderegger, Franziska Lamprecht, and Dan Seiple, had an unprecedented level of access to the World Trade Center, inhabiting the 91st floor of the North Tower for two years (sleeping and working overnight) Under The Artist Residency Program in the Twin Towers.
.
This prolonged presence raises questions about their true intentions and the nature of their work.
One notable project, "127 Illuminated Windows," showcased the E-Team's innovative approach. By attempting to write their names on the exterior of the Towers using illuminated windows on the 91st floor, they transformed the iconic building's facade into a canvas. This bold gesture raised questions about the role of art in public spaces and the relationship between artists and architecture.
Their other project, "Quick Click," was equally intriguing. Using a helicopter to capture portraits of individuals within the studio, they manipulated the boundaries between art, surveillance, and control. This bold move begs the question: what other forms of reconnaissance were they conducting during their extended tenure within the World Trade Center?
Their work, now shrouded in mystery, remains an enigma waiting to be deciphered.
-E-Team Photographs-
Image 1 - E-Team's 127 Illuminated Windows
Image 2 - E-Team's 127 Illuminated Windows Proposal sketch (Digital collage)
Image 3 - Daniel Seiple Website (Link Below)
Image 4 - E-Team's Quick Click Photos (Link Below)
Image 5 - The Artist Residency Program In The Twin Towers (E-Team LMCC Approval)
Image 1 - E-Team's 127 Illuminated Windows Compared To 9/11
E-Team – 127 Illuminated Windows, March 31st 2001, 91st Floor of WTC 1, New York In Comparison To 9/11 Attacks
E-Team's Quick Click Helicopter Stunt (Video Link Below)
Port Authority Of New York And New Jersey Lose Claim For Asbestos Removal
May 13, 2001
NEWARK-Asbestos abatement costs are not covered by an all-risks property policy unless an actual asbestos release or an imminent release leaves a property useless or uninhabitable, a federal judge has ruled.
U.S. District Judge John W. Bissell earlier this month threw out the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey's final claims in a longstanding suit against dozens of insurers over coverage of more than $600 million in asbestos abatement costs at the World Trade Center, New York's three major airports and other Port Authority properties.
Granting summary judgment for the insurers in his May 1 ruling, Judge Bissell found among other things that the costs of removing asbestos do not constitute "physical loss or damage" triggering coverage under the Port Authority's all-risk policies.
A Port Authority spokesman said the agency is reviewing the ruling and has not decided whether to appeal.
"We have noted, however, that the judge himself observed that there was no controlling case with respect to the question before the court," the spokesman said.
The ruling ends the trial phase of a decade-long court battle that began when the Port Authority sued its property insurers in 1991 in a New Jersey state court.
The suit sought recovery of the Port Authority's huge expenses of removing asbestos from hundreds of properties ranging from the enormous World Trade Center complex-which represented more than $200 million of the abatement costs-to bridge and tunnel toll booths.
Image 1 - Port Loses Claim For Asbestos Removal (Link Below)
Image 2 - Court Upholds Denial Of Cover For Asbestos Abatement (Link Below)
With All The Information Cited Above
It is peculiar that Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy (Westfield) acquired the World Trade Center in July 2001, despite being aware of the extensive asbestos contamination and the estimated $200+ million in removal costs. (Keep in mind, the head of the Port Authority who was behind the deal was Lewis Eisenberg)
1. The Port Authority had been dealing with asbestos issues for decades, and the costs were well-documented (In the billions $$$)
2. Silverstein's purchase of the complex, just months before the 9/11 attacks, has raised questions about his awareness of the asbestos liability and whether it was a factor in his subsequent insurance claims and payouts
3. The coincidence of the timing and circumstances has sparked debate and scrutiny.
Silverstein's insurance claims and payouts have been subject to controversy and debate.
Find Out More Below
Larry Silverstein And Frank Lowy Purchase The World Trade Center / Silverstein's Double Insurance Scheme
-Port Authority Finalize Silverstein Properties And Westfield America's Bid-
Date: Apr 26, 2001
Press Release Number: 68
<<<<<99-Year Net Lease Worth $3.2 Billion; Richest Real Estate Transaction in New York History>>>>>>
The World Trade Center today became the richest real estate prize in New York City history as the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey reached agreement with a major New York City developer and an international shopping center operator on a long-term lease of the famous Twin Towers and other properties at the World Trade Center.
Silverstein Properties, Inc., and Westfield America, Inc. have agreed to a net lease transaction for a term of 99 years, worth an estimated $3.2 billion on a present value basis. The net lease covers four buildings at the World Trade Center, including the Twin Towers and the retail Mall. The lease was approved by the Port Authority's Board of Commissioners at their meeting today.
------------------------
Considered a white elephant in its early years, the World Trade Center, an engineering marvel, became a highly successful office and retail complex in downtown Manhattan, attracting tenants from around the world and becoming an international symbol of New York. It is now the most valuable commercial property in the history of New York.
The buildings included in the net lease agreement are Number One and Two World Trade Center (the Twin Towers), Four and Five World Trade Center (two nine-story office buildings) and approximately 400,000 square feet of retail space. Numbers Three (the WTC Marriott Hotel), Six (the U.S. Customs House) and Seven World Trade Center (a 47-story office building) are already under lease.
Image 1 - Port Authority Finalize Silverstein And America's Bid (Link Below)
Image 2 - Deal Is Signed To Take Over Trade Center (Link Below)
-Port Authority Finalize Silverstein Properties And Westfield America's Bid-
On July 24, 2001, Larry Silverstein, a New York City real estate investor and developer, signed a 99-year lease for the World Trade Center site.
This lease agreement, valued at $3.2 billion, was a joint venture between Silverstein Properties and Westfield America, an Australian shopping center corporation owned by Frank Lowy.
The partnership granted Silverstein control over the complex, including the Twin Towers, which were destroyed in the September 11 attacks just six weeks later.
The lease agreement included a clause that gave Silverstein the right and obligation to rebuild the structures if they were destroyed. This clause would become a crucial aspect of the subsequent rebuilding efforts and the controversies surrounding the insurance payouts and rebuilding plans.
Silverstein's acquisition of the WTC lease was a significant milestone in his career, marking a major expansion of his real estate portfolio.
However, the tragic events that unfolded shortly after would forever change the trajectory of his involvement with the site.
But was it mere coincidence that Silverstein signed the lease just six weeks before the 9/11 attacks?
Or was it a calculated move, paving the way for a lucrative rebuilding project?
The truth remains shrouded in mystery, fueling speculation and conspiracy theories that continue to surround the events of that fateful day.
Image 1 - World Trade Center Silverstein Lease Notice, July 24, 2001 (Link Below)
-TERRORISM RISK INSURANCE ACT OF 2002-
The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) of 2002 is a federal law in the United States that provides a government backstop for insurance claims related to terrorism.
The law was enacted in response to the 9/11 attacks, which highlighted the need for terrorism insurance coverage. TRIA's key provisions:
1. Government reinsurance: The government provides reinsurance to insurance companies, covering a portion of their terrorism-related losses.
2. Mandatory coverage: Insurers must offer terrorism coverage to policyholders.
3. Premiums: Policyholders pay premiums for terrorism coverage, which is typically a small fraction of their overall insurance premium.
4. Deductible: Insurers must pay a deductible (a percentage of their losses) before government reinsurance kicks in.
5. Cap: The government's liability is capped at $100 billion per year.
TRIA's purpose is to:
1. Stabilize the insurance market
2. Encourage insurers to offer terrorism coverage
3. Reduce the financial impact of terrorism on businesses and individuals TRIA has been extended several times since its initial enactment, with the most recent extension occurring in 2020.
In the context of the Larry Silverstein case, TRIA's provisions may have contributed to the large insurance payouts he received, as the government's reinsurance program helped cover a portion of the losses.
-My View Of The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act Of 2002 -
The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) of 2002 - a law enacted in response to the 9/11 attacks, or so they say.
On the surface, TRIA appears to be a well-intentioned measure to stabilize the insurance market and protect businesses from the financial impact of terrorism. But, some might ask, what if TRIA was actually designed to serve a more sinister purpose?
Think about it: TRIA provides a government backstop for insurance claims related to terrorism, which means the government is essentially underwriting the risk of terrorism.
And who benefits from this arrangement?
Insurance companies, like those who paid out billions to Larry Silverstein, and developers like Silverstein himself, who can now rebuild and profit from the ashes of the World Trade Center.
Some might call it a coincidence, but others see a more nefarious connection.
Was TRIA merely a response to 9/11, or was it a carefully crafted plan to ensure that the real beneficiaries of terrorism - the corporations and developers - would be protected and even profited from the tragedy?
The truth, as always, remains shrouded in mystery, but one thing is certain - the tentacles of TRIA reach far and deep, and its true impact may never be fully known.
-Double Trouble: The 9/11 Insurance Claims Scandal-
Larry Silverstein, the developer of the World Trade Center site, has already received $4.6 billion in insurance payouts for the 9/11 attacks.
However, he is seeking additional damages from airlines and airport security companies, claiming they failed to prevent the hijackings.
Silverstein has also been fighting his insurance companies in court, arguing that the attacks on the Twin Towers were two separate events, entitling him to double the amount of his $3.5 billion policy.
In a major victory, a jury agreed with Silverstein, deciding that the hijacked airline attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, were indeed two separate events.
This verdict means Silverstein could receive up to $7.1 billion in insurance payouts, which would help finance the rebuilding of the World Trade Center.
However, the insurers have pledged to appeal the verdict if necessary. Silverstein has vowed to restore 10 million square feet of office space on the site, known as Ground Zero.
He has also partnered with Westfield America, owned by Australian billionaire Frank Lowy, to develop the retail and office space in the new complex. Westfield America held a 99-year lease on the retail and office space in the original World Trade Center and stands to gain a significant amount from the insurance payouts.
But some question whether Silverstein's eagerness to rebuild and collect insurance payouts is more than just a coincidence.
Was the 9/11 attack a tragic event, or a carefully orchestrated plan to clear the way for a lucrative redevelopment project?
The truth may never be fully known, but one thing is certain
Larry Silverstein stands to gain billions from the ashes of the World Trade Center.
Image 1 - 9/11 ruled as two events for insurance purposes (Link Below)
Image 2 - Westfield seeks to double Sept 11 payout (Link Below)
-Westfield Exits World Trade Center Lease-
As the dust settled on the devastated site, now known as Ground Zero, a sense of reverence and mourning swept the nation. The country was in agony, and Frank Lowy, the Australian billionaire owner of Westfield, knew that his voice would be unwelcome in the debate about the site's future. After all, Westfield's stake in the World Trade Center was relatively small, and Lowy was savvy enough to recognize that this was a moment for Americans to take center stage.
But behind the scenes, Lowy and his son Peter were busy making deals. They negotiated an arrangement with the Port Authority, the owners of the land, to relinquish their claim on the site in exchange for a coveted prize:
The first option on the retail space when the site was redeveloped. It was a clever move, one that would allow Westfield to wait patiently in the wings while the complex and contentious process of rebuilding played out.
And so, Westfield bided its time, waiting for the perfect moment to strike. Meanwhile, the Port Authority and other stakeholders grappled with the daunting task of redeveloping the site, navigating a maze of competing interests, political agendas, and emotional sensitivities.
But Westfield's patience would eventually be rewarded, as they would ultimately secure a lucrative deal to develop the retail space at Ground Zero, a move that would cement their position as a major player in the redevelopment of the site. Coincidence, or clever strategic maneuvering?
The truth, as always, remains hidden behind closed doors.
Image 1 - Westfield Exits World Trade Center Lease (Link Below)
Image 2 - Lowy's kept the dream alive (Link Below)
Image 3 - Tragedy strikes (Link Below)
-Silverstein Sues to Win $12.3 Billion in 9/11 Attack-
Larry Silverstein, the developer of the World Trade Center site, is seeking $12.3 billion in damages from airlines and airport security companies for the 9/11 attack.
This amount is in addition to the $4.6 billion he has already received in insurance payouts. Silverstein's claim, filed in 2004, alleges that the airlines and security companies failed to prevent the hijackings.
The case has been consolidated with other lawsuits brought by victims' families and property owners. Silverstein's claim is the largest, totaling $12.3 billion, which could potentially jeopardize claims from other parties.
Defense lawyers argue that Silverstein has already been adequately compensated through insurance payouts.
However, Silverstein's lawyer, Richard Williamson, claims that the damages are necessary to cover ongoing losses and costs associated with rebuilding the site.
Judge Alvin Hellerstein expressed skepticism about Silverstein's claim, questioning why he didn't "walk away" from the lease and stem his losses. Silverstein's lawyer argued that the lease requires him to rebuild and continue paying rent.
Image 1 - Developer Sues to Win $12.3 Billion in 9/11 Attack (Link Below)
Image 2 - Developer sues to recover 9/11 costs (Link Below)
Silverstein put up $14 million of his own money to secure the deal,
walking away with $4.6 billion after the September 11 attacks...
The Dancing Israelis / Urban Moving / 100s Of Israelis Detained In Connection With The Israeli Art Student Spy Ring
On September 11, 2001, a New Jersey homemaker named Maria witnessed something peculiar while watching the World Trade Center attacks from her apartment.
She saw three young men kneeling on the roof of a white van, taking videos or photos of themselves with the burning towers in the background.
Their expressions seemed happy and nonchalant, which Maria found suspicious. She wrote down the van's license plate number and called the police, leading to a statewide bulletin and the van's eventual stop near Giants Stadium.
The five men inside, aged between 22 and 27 years old, were detained and identified as Israeli citizens.
(Five Israeli men, identified as Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Yaron Shmuel, and Omar Marmari)
In the car was multiple foreign passports each with different flights (how Mossad operate as seen in the Murder of Mahmoud Al Mabhouh) $4500 in cash and a pair of box cutters - the concealed Stanley Knife-type blades used by the 19 hijackers who'd flown jetliners into the World Trade Centre and Pentagon just hours before.
There were also freshly taken pictures of the men standing with the smouldering wreckage of the Twin Towers in the background. One image showed a hand flicking a lighter in front of the devastated buildings, like a fan at a pop concert.
The driver, Sivan Kurzberg, claimed they were on the West Side Highway during the attack and said,
"We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem."
Further investigation revealed another van on King Street, allegedly linked to the men, containing explosives. A warrant was then issued for a search of the Urban Moving premises in Weehawken in New Jersey.
Boxes of papers, files and computers were removed. The FBI questioned the firm's Israeli owner, Dominik Otto Suter, but when agents returned to re-interview him a few days later, he was gone. (Headed to Israel)
An employee of Urban Moving said his co-workers had laughed about the WTC attacks the day they happened. "I was in tears," the man said. "These guys were joking and that bothered me. These guys were like, Now America knows what we go through.'"
Vince Cannistraro, former chief of operations for counter-terrorism with the CIA, says the red flag went up among investigators when it was discovered that some of the Israelis' names were found in the national intelligence database.
Cannistraro says many in the US intelligence community believed that some of the Israelis were working for Mossad and there was speculation over whether Urban Moving had been "set up or exploited for the purpose of launching an intelligence operation against radical Islamists." (Mossad front company)
After the owner vanished, the offices of Urban Moving looked as if they'd been closed down in a massive rush. Phones were thrown about, the office phones were still connected and the property of at least a dozen clients were still in the warehouse.
The owner had cleared out his family home in New Jersey and returned to Israel.
Two weeks after their arrest, the Israelis were still in detention, held on immigration charges. Then a judge ruled that they should be deported.
But the CIA prevented the deal and the five remained in custody for another two months.
Some went into solitary confinement, all underwent two polygraph tests and at least one underwent up to seven lie detector tests before they were eventually deported at the end of November 2001.
Paul Kurzberg refused to take a lie detector test for 10 weeks, but then finally agreed and failed it.
His lawyer said he was reluctant to take the test as he had once worked for Israeli intelligence in another country.
Despite the suspicious circumstances, the men were released and deported back to Israel. Michael Chertoff (a Talmud scholar), then head of the DEA and later Secretary of Homeland Security, and son of Livia Eisen Chertoff the first airline hostess for Mossad's El Al Airlines, was directly involved in the decision to release the men.
The respected New York Jewish newspaper, The Forward, reported in March 2002, that it had received a briefing on the case of the five Israelis from a US official who was regularly updated by law enforcement agencies.
This is what he told The Forward:
"The assessment was that Urban Moving Systems was a front for the Mossad and operatives employed by it."
He added that "the conclusion of the FBI was that they were spying on local Arabs", but the men were released because they "did not know anything about 9/11".
Back in Israel, several of the men discussed what happened on an Israeli talk show. One of them made this very strange comment:
"The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
There is more than a little circumstantial evidence to show that Mossad - whose motto is
"By way of deception, thou shalt do war" - was spying on Arab extremists in the USA and may have known that September 11 was in the making, yet decided to withhold vital information from their American counterparts which could have prevented the terror attacks.
Following September 11, 2001, more than 60 Israelis were taken into custody under the Patriot Act and immigration laws. One highly placed investigator told Carl Cameron of Fox News that there were "tie-ins" between the Israelis and September 11
The Fox News source refused to give details, saying: "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." Fox News is not noted for its condemnation of Israel; it's a ruggedly patriotic news channel owned by Rupert Murdoch and was President Bush's main cheerleader in the war on terror and the invasion of Iraq.
Another group of around 140 Israelis were detained prior to September 11, 2001, in the USA as part of a widespread investigation into a suspected espionage ring run by Israel inside the USA.
Government documents refer to the spy ring as an "organised intelligence-gathering operation" designed to "penetrate government facilities". Most of those arrested had served in the Israeli armed forces - but military service is compulsory in Israel. Nevertheless, a number had an intelligence background.
The first glimmerings of an Israeli spying exercise in the USA came to light in spring 2001, when the FBI sent a warning to other federal agencies alerting them to be wary of visitors calling themselves "Israeli art students" and attempting to bypass security at federal buildings in order to sell paintings.
A Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) report suggested the Israeli calls "may well be an organised intelligence-gathering activity". Law enforcement documents say that the Israelis "targeted and penetrated military bases" as well as the DEA, FBI and dozens of government facilities, including secret offices and the unlisted private homes of law enforcement and intelligence personnel.
A number of Israelis questioned by the authorities said they were students from Bezalel Academy of Art and Design, but Pnina Calpen, a spokeswoman for the Israeli school, did not recognise the names of any Israelis mentioned as studying there in the past 10 years.
A federal report into the so-called art students said many had served in intelligence and electronic signal intercept units during their military service.
According to a 61-page report, drafted after an investigation by the DEA and the US immigration service, the Israelis were organised into cells of four to six people.
The significance of what the Israelis were doing didn't emerge until after September 11, 2001, when a report by a French intelligence agency noted "according to the FBI, Arab terrorists and suspected terror cells lived in Phoenix, Arizona, as well as in Miami and Hollywood, Florida, from December 2000 to April 2001 in direct proximity to the Israeli spy cells".
The report contended that Mossad agents were spying on Mohammed Atta and Marwan al-Shehi, two of leaders of the 9/11 hijack teams. The pair had settled in Hollywood, Florida, along with three other hijackers, after leaving Hamburg - where another Mossad team was operating close by. Hollywood in Florida is a town of just 25,000 souls.
The French intelligence report says the leader of the Mossad cell in Florida rented apartments "right near the apartment of Atta and al-Shehi".
More than a third of the Israeli "art students" claimed residence in Florida. Two other Israelis connected to the art ring showed up in Fort Lauderdale.
At one time, eight of the hijackers lived just north of the town. Put together, the facts do appear to indicate that Israel knew that 9/11, or at least a large-scale terror attack, was about to take place on American soil, But did nothing to warn the USA.
Some believe that Israel's silence was more than just a coincidence - it was a deliberate act of deception.
The Mossad's motto, "By way of deception, thou shalt do war," seems to echo through the events of 9/11. As the dust settles, one thing is clear: the truth about Israel's involvement in 9/11 remains shrouded in mystery.
But connect the dots, and a sinister picture emerges. The Israeli art students, the Urban Moving Systems, the Mossad agents - all seem to be part of a larger web of deceit.
And what about the Gelitin art collective, who infiltrated the World Trade Center in 2000? Were they just some artists, or were they gathering intel for a future attack?
The more you dig, the more you realize that nothing is as it seems. The 9/11 attacks were not just a terrorist plot - they were a carefully orchestrated event, with players on both sides of the equation.
So, who really knew what was going to happen on that fateful day? And who benefited from the chaos that ensued? The truth, remains elusive.
But one thing is certain - the world will never be the same again."
-Newspaper Articles-
Image 1 - 5 Young Israelis, Caught in Net of Suspicion (Link Below)
Image 2 - Dozens of Israeli Jews Are Being Kept in Federal Detention (Link Below)
Image 3 - Five Israelis were seen filming as jet liners ploughed into the Twin Towers (Link Below)
Image 4 - Were Israelis Detained on Sept. 11 Spies? (Link Below)
Image 1 - The Forward ("Respected Jewish Newspaper") (Link Below)
-Photographs The Dancing Israelis Took Infront Of Burning WTC-
Image 1 - Dancing Israeli Posing With Lighter Infront Of WTC (Must View)
Image 2 - Dancing Israelis Posing Infront Of WTC (Must View)
Image 3 - Dancing Israeli Pointing At Burning WTC (Must View)
Image 4 - Dancing Israelis Selfie Posing Infront Of WTC (Must View)
Image 5 - Dancing Israelis Selfie Posing Infront Of WTC (Must View)
Image 6 - Dancing Israelis Group Photo Taken Infront Of WTC (Must View)
-CIA / FBI Documents-
CIA Document 1 (Link Below)
CIA Document 2 (Link Below)
FBI Document 1 (Link Below)
FBI Document 2 (Link Below)
Extra FBI Documents 7 PDF's (No Images)
-Live TV News Report-
Video 1 - ABC - Report The Dancing Israelis (Link Below)
Video 2 - CNN Report - On The Van With Explosives (Link Below)
Video 3 - Fox News - Report On The Israeli Art Student Spy Ring, Dancing Israelis And 100s Of Israeli Arrest's Connected To Espionage (Link Below)
Video 4 - Edited Together Clip (Link Below)
-Dancing Israelis On Israeli Talk Show-
Video 1 - The Dancing Israelis On Israeli Talk Show November 2001 (Link Below)
-Sergeant Scott DeCarlo (Officer Who Arrested Dancing Israelis)-
Audio 1 - Sergeant Scott DeCarlo Explains Ordeal To American Free Press (Link Below) https://americanfreepress.net/podcast/ScottDeCarlo64.mp3
Image 1 - Sergeant Scott DeCarlo Explains Ordeal To American Free Press Written Testament (Link Below)
Prior Warnings To Israel (Odigo)
OFFICIALS at instant-messaging firm Odigo confirmed that two employees received text messages warning of an attack on the World Trade Center two hours before terrorists crashed planes into the New York landmarks.
Citing a pending investigation by law enforcement, the company declined to reveal the exact contents of the message or to identify the sender.
But Alex Diamandis, vice president of sales and marketing, confirmed that workers in Odigo's research and development and international sales office in Israel received a warning from another Odigo user approximately two hours prior to the first attack.
Diamandis said the sender of the instant message was not personally known to the Odigo employees.
Even though the company usually protects the privacy of users, the employees recorded the Internet protocol address of the message's sender to facilitate his or her identification.
Soon after the terrorist attacks on New York, the Odigo employees notified their management, who contacted Israeli security services.
In turn, the FBI was informed of the instant message warning. FBI officials were not immediately available for comment today.
The Odigo service includes a feature called People Finder that allows users to seek out and contact others based on certain interests or demographics.
Diamandis said it was possible that the attack warning was broadcast to other Odigo members, but the company has not received reports of other recipients of the message.
Parts Cited From
-Newspaper Article-
Image 1 - Haareetz article "Odigo Says Workers Were Warned of Attack" (Link Below)
Image 2 - ABC article- "FBI Releases Photos, Seeks Public Tips" FBI investigating Odigo and Alex Diamandis (Link Below)
The 4,000 Israelis Who Didn't Show Up To Work On 9/11
Above's paragraph was written in an article by The Jerusalem Post on September 12, 2001 and The Jewish Telegraphic Agency on September 13, 2001
(Jerusalem Post article has been deleted off the internet but thanks to David Irving, Christopher Bollyn and many other Truth Seekers we are able to let it live on Click Here)
(Jewish Telegraphic Agency article Click Here)
-How Many Israelis Died Out Of The Supposed 4000 Feared For-
When George Bush made his speech before Congress, it turns out that he made a significant error other than saying that the WTC attackers did it because they "hated freedom," Bush made a point of saying that in addition to thousands of Americans, 130 Israelis died in the WTC.
The implication was to say that Israel shared in our suffering, and that we and Israel are in this thing together.
Upon hearing the number of 130 Israeli dead, it seemed suspiciously low to me.
If 4,000 Israelis were at the WTC and the WTC death toll was about 4,500 (about 10 percent of the 45,000 people normally in the buildings at that time), the Israeli toll should have probably been between 300 and 500.
Of the 130 Israelis President Bush claimed had died in the World Trade Center, it turned out that 129 of them were still alive. Only one Israeli had actually died in the catastrophe of the World Trade Center. As Stated In The New York Times Below:
Having only one Israeli casualty among the 4,500 dead at the WTC is simply a statistical impossibility.
Even if the Israeli Foreign Ministry and the Jerusalem Post had grossly overestimated the number of Israelis in the World Trade Center by 3,000 (400 percent), there still should have still been one thousand Israelis there at the time of the attacks.
Again, even if only a few hundred Israelis were present at the time of the attack, only one Israeli death occurring there is statistically absurd.
Either September 11 had to be a big Israeli holiday, or a number of Israeli citizens had some advance warning of the impending attack.
The fact is that no Israeli or Jewish holiday falls on September 11.
3 Israelis in total died in the September 11 attacks, 2 on the hijacked flights and one visiting the Towers
David Irving comments:
THIS article is a shameless flashback, repeated here for no other reason than that somebody emailed it to me today.
It reminds us of Man's propensity to exaggerate, if not to lie outright, if he can thereby gain some sympathy and if, some way down the road, monetary compensation might be harvested from a tragedy.
We are happy to report that the 4,000 figure dwindled eventually to three (not three thousand, but three), then two, then one: the unfortunate Daniel Lewin, who sat in front of one armed hijacker -- yes, the man carried a gun, so all four hijack teams must by logical extrapolation have carried firearms -- who shot him in the back of the head.
Lewin was later identified as a Mossad agent, which explains why the Israeli authorities identified his loss so quickly.
9/11 Working Group FBI Document Number 11 https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0001500711.pdf
Parts Cited From
-Newspaper Articles-
Image 1 - Jewish Telegraphic Agency "4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the areas of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon" (Link Below)
Image 2 - NyTimes "Officials Say Number of Those Still Missing May Be Overstated" -Alon Pinkas says only 3 Israelis died (Link Below)
Extra Article 9/11 Facts- 4,000 Israelis did not show up for work
Extra Article The Guardian- Millions believe 4,000 Jews stayed away from the World Trade Centre
-Christopher Bollyn Video-
One Company, Four Flights The ICTS Connection
ICTS, at the time an Israeli-owned company, owned by Ezra Harrell that had many ex-Shin Bet officers among its personnel, was aware of Shoe Bomber Richard Reid's suspicious behavior but failed to prevent him from boarding a flight from Paris to Miami.
This incident raises questions about ICTS's role in airport security.
Further investigation reveals that ICTS handled security at Logan International Airport, from which two of the 9/11 hijacked planes departed.
With reports that hijackers were able to bring box cutters and knives on at least three of the four hijacked planes highlights a significant security lapse. This, combined with ICTS's involvement, suggests a level of inside help.
The fact that one company had unrestricted access to these airports raises important questions.
It appears that someone with foreknowledge of the attacks chose not to alert ICTS, which could have prevented the flights from departing.
The connection between ICTS and the 9/11 attacks warrants further examination, particularly in light of the company's Israeli ownership and potential links to Mossad agents.
ICTS's involvement in handling security at multiple airports involved in the 9/11 hijackings, including Logan International Airport, adds to the scrutiny.
Consider this stunning revelation:
Not long after 9/11, the chairman of ICTS, Ezra Harel, whose surname is famous in the annals of the Mossad, died suddenly of a heart attack in his early 50s on his yacht off the coast of Palestine. Talk about not being available for comment!
But that's not all, just hours before the House voted on the initial Patriot Act, 'technical corrections' were sneakily inserted into the legislation, granting foreign security companies like ICTS-International immunity from lawsuits related to 9/11.
This clever maneuver ensured that ICTS-International would evade accountability and avoid deposition.
This occurred before the 9/11 Commission was even established, when President George W. Bush was still resisting calls for an investigation into the attacks.
As a result, citizens were denied the opportunity for a thorough discovery process, which would have compelled ICTS-International to testify and provide evidence about the missing airport surveillance tapes and security measures in place on 9/11.
This legislative sleight of hand effectively shielded ICTS-International from scrutiny, allowing them to conceal their involvement and potential negligence on 9/11.
The absence of a discovery process means that critical questions remain unanswered, and ICTS-International's role in the events of that day remains shrouded in mystery.
Parts Cited From
-Newspaper Articles-
Image 1 - ADL doesn't deny ICTS Connection (Link Below)
Image 2 - The Street report that ICTS ran Logan checkpoint (Link Below)
Image 3 - Ny Magazine - “every single flight had unequivocal evidence that 9/11 was preventable at the checkpoints.” (Link Below)
Extra Article Bush-Linked Company Handled Security for the WTC, Dulles and United
BBCs Early Report Of Building 7s Collapse
On September 11, 2001, the BBC made a shocking announcement:
Building 7 of the World Trade Center had collapsed.
But there was one problem - the building was still standing. In fact, it wouldn't collapse for another 26 minutes.
At 4:54 pm EST, the BBC's Jane Standley reported that Building 7 had collapsed, citing eyewitnesses and sources. (Jewish Founded Company Reuters)
However, video footage shows that the building remained standing until 5:20 pm EST, when it suddenly and mysteriously collapsed.
Reuters later issued a correction, and the BBC acknowledged the error.
But many still question how Reuters could have made such a mistake. Was it simply a case of misinformation, or was something more sinister at play?
The 26-minute discrepancy remains unexplained. If it was simply a mistake, why did the BBC not correct it immediately?
And why did Reuters wait to issue a correction until after the building had actually collapsed?
The incident reeks of foreknowledge and complicity.
What's even more peculiar is the way that Building 7 collapsed. The 47-story steel-framed building crumbled into its own footprint, without any visible signs of damage or distress.
The official explanation - that the building collapsed due to fires caused by debris from the Twin Towers - is unconvincing.
No steel-framed building had ever collapsed due to fire before or since 9/11, making this event a singular anomaly.
The lack of damage to the building's exterior makes this explanation even more implausible.
It's as if the building's central columns simply gave way, causing a perfect implosion. The collapse of Building 7 bears all the hallmarks of a controlled demolition.
The building fell in a smooth, vertical motion, with minimal debris ejected from the site. This is not consistent with a random collapse due to fire or damage.
As we delve deeper into the mystery, we find a web of deceit and corruption that goes all the way to the top. The government, the media, and the intelligence agencies - all seem to be hiding something.
The truth about 9/11, and the collapse of Building 7, remains a closely guarded secret, known only to a select few. But one thing is certain - the official narrative is a lie, and those who seek to expose the truth will be silenced, ridiculed, or worse.
The investigation continues, but it's a dangerous game. Those who dig too deep will find themselves in the crosshairs of the powerful forces that seek to keep the truth hidden.
But still, we must ask the questions, no matter the cost. For in the words of the great whistleblower, Daniel Ellsberg, "The truth is the most powerful force on earth, and it will prevail." Or will it?
-Newspaper Articles-
"Fact Check"
Image 1 - BBC News Blog "Clarifying Their Position" (Link Below)
Image 2 - "Error in BBC reporting doesn’t mean 9/11 was scripted" (Link Below)
Image 3 - "BBC News report on 9/11 was a mistake, not revelation of planned plot" (Link Below)
-Live News BBCs Early Report Of Building 7-
Video 1 - Jane Standley Reporting Building 7 collapse as it stands behind her (Link Below)
Image 1 - Jane Standley Reporting Building 7 collapse as it stands behind her
-Building 7 Compared To Controlled Demolition-
Video 1 - Building 7 Compared To Controlled Demolition
{Left- Building 7} - {Bottom Building 7} - {Top Controlled Demo}
-Victims Family/Engineers Refute Building 7s Collapse Caused By Fire-
Image 1 - World Trade Center 7 building did not collapse due to fire: Report (Link Below)
The Presence Of Active Thermite In WTC Rubble: A Scientific Analysis
The collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001, has been a topic of intense debate and scrutiny.
While the official narrative attributes the collapse to fire and damage from the plane impacts, a significant body of evidence suggests that other factors may have contributed to the catastrophic failure of the structures.
One such piece of evidence is the presence of active thermite in the WTC rubble, as confirmed by multiple scientific studies.
Thermite, a highly energetic and reactive mixture of metal powder and metal oxide, has been identified in various samples of WTC debris.
This finding has sparked controversy and raised questions about the possibility of controlled demolition.
Scientific Reports
1. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe (2009) A study published in the Open Chemical Physics Journal by Niels H. Harrit et al. found evidence of active thermite in WTC dust samples.
-The researchers discovered small, red-gray chips in the dust, which were identified as thermite using various analytical techniques, including X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).-
2. Characterization of Metal Particles in WTC Dust (2012) A study published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies by Mark B. Larsen et al. analyzed metal particles in WTC dust samples.
-The researchers found particles with characteristics consistent with thermite, including spherical shapes and high iron content.-
3. WTC Dust Analysis (2013)
A study published in the International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications by J. R. Gourley et al. examined WTC dust samples using various analytical techniques.
-The researchers found evidence of thermite, including high levels of iron and aluminum.
Conclusion The presence of active thermite in WTC rubble is a scientifically established fact, supported by multiple studies using various analytical techniques. While the exact significance of this finding is still debated, it undoubtedly raises important questions about the events surrounding the WTC collapse. Further research is necessary to fully understand the implications of this discovery.-
-Article Links-
The 91st Floor: A Crucial Clue in the 9/11 Enigma
The 91st floor of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is a location that has garnered significant attention in the quest for truth about 9/11.
Deep within the belly of the North Tower, the 91st floor harbored a secretive community of artists, shrouded in mystery and intrigue.
The Artist Residency Program, a clandestine initiative, provided a veil of legitimacy for this coterie of creatives. (Click Here If Link Doesn't Work)
Among them was Gelitin, an enigmatic art collective known for their subversive and often provocative works.
Their presence on the 91st floor raises questions about the true nature of their art and its potential connections to the nefarious events unfolding around them.
Rumors swirl about Gelitin's involvement with the enigmatic "E-Team", a group of artists and engineers.
As we delve deeper into the rabbit hole, the lines between art, espionage, and deception blur. Were Gelitin and the E-Team mere pawns in a larger game, or did they play a more sinister role?
The significance of the 91st floor is further underscored by the fact that it was one of the few areas of the North Tower that was not damaged in the initial impact of American Airlines Flight 11.
This anomaly has sparked intense scrutiny, especially in light of Gelitin's use of BB-18 fuse boxes in their art installations.
Did they utilize these devices for innocent artistic purposes, or did they play a more sinister role in the events of 9/11?
The presence of these fuse boxes, combined with Gelitin's secretive activities, adds fuel to the speculation surrounding potential bomb placement.
-Images/Video Below-
Image 1 - THE 91ST FLOOR; The Line Between Life and Death (Link Below)
Image 2 - Timeline for the day of September 11 attacks (Link Below)
Image 3 - Escape from 91st floor South Tower: Book (Link Below)
Video 1 - From the archives: Man who worked on 91st floor at World Trade Center describes how he survived (Link Below)
Regarding New York Times Article Below Read Between The Purple Highlight ( )
"After the 1993 trade center bombing, one of the engineers who worked on the towers' structural design in the 1960's even claimed that each one had been built to withstand the impact of a fully loaded, fully fueled Boeing 707, then the heaviest aircraft flying."
Despite the official narrative, the truth about 9/11 remains shrouded in mystery. Was it a terrorist attack, a government conspiracy, or something even more sinister?
We may never know for certain. But one thing is clear: the events of 9/11 have had a profound impact on our world, shaping global politics, wars, and civil liberties. It's crucial that we continue to question, seek truth, and hold those in power accountable.
As we move forward, remember that the truth is not always easy to accept, but it's essential to our collective freedom and humanity. Keep seeking, keep questioning, and never stop demanding the truth.
Rest in peace to the victims of 9/11, and may the truth eventually set us free.
The Truth About 9/11 Explained -Documentary by Ken O'Keefe
Unfortunately I've Ran Out Of Space On This Page... So If You'd Like To Know More, Follow On Bellow
Click Title Below To Be Redirected To My Article
Benefiting From Chaos: How 9/11 Advanced Israel's Agenda
(Coming Soon)
Click Title Below To Be Redirected To My Video Archive
(Give It Some Time To Load, The Video Section -Jews Did 9/11- Will Pop Up)